Amazon Web Services vs Microsoft Azure

Comparing Amazon Web Services against Microsoft Azure on equivalent workload tiers. At the entry level, Amazon Web Services starts cheaper at $0.0042/hour, while the more expensive side trades higher list price for broader catalogue and managed-service depth. At the common 2 vCPU / 4-8 GB tier, Amazon Web Services offers t4g.medium at $24.53/month versus Microsoft Azure's Standard_B2pts_v2 at $6.13/month. Microsoft Azure wins on raw monthly price. Choose Amazon Web Services when ecosystem depth, regional breadth, or specific managed services matter; choose Microsoft Azure when the priority is raw price/performance for steady-state workloads. Verify region availability and any reserved-capacity discounts before committing.

All Amazon Web Services All Microsoft Azure

Combined catalogue

Amazon Web Services + Microsoft Azure

Rows85

Filters

Showing of instances · sorted by

vCPU –

RAM (GB) –

Region

Best for

Search instance name

Sort by

Selected — monthly price

rows selected. Click rows in the table to toggle.

	Provider	Family / instance	vCPU	CPU type	RAM GB	Storage	Net Gbps	Best for	Hourly $	Monthly $	Annual $
									$	$	$	Buy
No instances match the current filters. Try widening the vCPU or RAM range.

Other comparisons

Amazon Web Services vs Google Cloud → Amazon Web Services vs Hetzner Cloud → Amazon Web Services vs DigitalOcean → Amazon Web Services vs Vultr → Amazon Web Services vs Linode (Akamai) → Google Cloud vs Microsoft Azure → Google Cloud vs Hetzner Cloud → Google Cloud vs DigitalOcean → Google Cloud vs Vultr → Google Cloud vs Linode (Akamai) → Microsoft Azure vs Hetzner Cloud → Microsoft Azure vs DigitalOcean → Microsoft Azure vs Vultr → Microsoft Azure vs Linode (Akamai) → Hetzner Cloud vs DigitalOcean → Hetzner Cloud vs Vultr → Hetzner Cloud vs Linode (Akamai) → DigitalOcean vs Vultr → DigitalOcean vs Linode (Akamai) → Vultr vs Linode (Akamai) →